Tendencies in the Cases for Crimes Against Property and the Courts’ Preventive Function

Simple item page
cris.sourceIdoai:journals.unwe.bg:article/455
dc.creatorMarkov, Pressiyanen
dc.date2020-05-28
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-24T23:12:40Z
dc.date.available2026-09-24T23:12:40Z
dc.descriptionThe double reduction in the number of criminal cases for crimes against property cannot be explained either by a decline in their perpetration nor by their low rate of solving by the police. Statistical analysis proves to be inefficient for explaining this phenomenon, so it is necessary to use legal reasoning. The reason is the amendment of Art. 218b of the Criminal Code, whereby the value of the property that is object of these crimes, under which they are sanctioned as administrative offences, is increased annually. Hence a great number of crimes against property are not accounted for by crime statistics. That is the reason art. 218b of the Criminal Code has to be amended as it was before 2010. Prior to repealing the interpretive acts of the Supreme Court concerning the courts’ preventive function, it is necessary to verify if the number of crimes against property has actually declined.en
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://rp.unwe.bg/index.php/rp/article/view/455
dc.identifier10.37075/RP.2020.2.04
dc.identifier.urihttps://ds.e-dnrs.org/handle/123456789/1496
dc.languagebg
dc.publisherAcademic Publishing UNWE (AP-UNWE)en
dc.relationhttps://rp.unwe.bg/index.php/rp/article/view/455/447
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 Pressiyan Markov (Author)en
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en
dc.sourceResearch Papers of UNWE; No. 2 (2020); 67-82en
dc.subjectTrenden
dc.subjectCrimes against propertyen
dc.subjectReductionen
dc.subjectStatisticsen
dc.subjectK14 - Criminal Lawen
dc.titleTendencies in the Cases for Crimes Against Property and the Courts’ Preventive Functionen
dc.typePeer-reviewed Articleen

Files

Collections

Научни трудове на УНСС