On the Problem - Subject of Interpretative Case № 4 of 2019 of the Supreme Administrative Court
| cris.sourceId | oai:journals.unwe.bg:article/423 | |
| dc.creator | Radev, Stefan | en |
| dc.date | 2020-10-22 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-24T23:12:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-24T23:12:22Z | |
| dc.description | The article discusses interpretative Case № 4/2019 of the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC). The purpose of the work is to answer the question posed in the interpretative case, with the following tasks to achieve it: analysis of the relevant legislation and interpretive practice. The methods of analysis, comparison and synthesis are applied and as a result one of the two positions of the supreme administrative judges is supported. | en |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | https://rp.unwe.bg/index.php/rp/article/view/423 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.37075/RP.2020.4.03 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ds.e-dnrs.org/handle/123456789/1435 | |
| dc.language | bg | |
| dc.publisher | Academic Publishing UNWE (AP-UNWE) | en |
| dc.relation | https://rp.unwe.bg/index.php/rp/article/view/423/415 | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2020 Stefan Radev (Author) | en |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en |
| dc.source | Research Papers of UNWE; No. 4 (2020); 41-48 | en |
| dc.subject | Inadmissible | en |
| dc.subject | Irregular | en |
| dc.subject | Cassation appeal | en |
| dc.subject | K49 - Other | en |
| dc.title | On the Problem - Subject of Interpretative Case № 4 of 2019 of the Supreme Administrative Court | en |
| dc.type | Peer-reviewed Article | en |